Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kloss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 26, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 22, 1994, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a massage therapist, worked at a health spa operated by Greater Saratoga Corporation (hereinafter GSC). She was found by the Board to be an employee of GSC and, therefore, entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits. GSC argues that claimant was an independent contractor and that the Board’s finding to the contrary is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. The evidence established that GSC,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Human Performance, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API