Legal Opinion

Zureck v. Wheeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Frank and Sue DeLuca appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated March 7, 1994, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, the motion of the defendants Frank and Sue DeLuca is granted, and the complaint is dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Herman v. WesgateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Luoni v. BerubeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Monroe v. RandoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Rodriguez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API