Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 8, 1983No. 82-1114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The final judgment entered by the trial court dismissing Continental’s complaint is affirmed. We conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action upon a holding that: (1) there is no common law cause of action for failure to recognize and protect subrogation rights of a workmen’s compensation carrier; subrogation on the part of an employer’s carrier in a workmen’s compensation case is solely a creature of statute, Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith, 272 So.2d 517 (Fla.1973); Brinson v. Southeastern Utilities Service Co., 72 So.2d 37 (Fla.1954); Fidelity &…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Brinson v. Southeastern Utilities Service Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  3. Cook Motor Company v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Alfar Creamery Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Dunnell v. Malone and Hyde, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Batch Air Universal Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Summit Claims Mgt. v. Lawyers Exp. TruckingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API