Continental Insurance v. Industrial Fire & Casualty Insurance
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The final judgment entered by the trial court dismissing Continental’s complaint is affirmed. We conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action upon a holding that: (1) there is no common law cause of action for failure to recognize and protect subrogation rights of a workmen’s compensation carrier; subrogation on the part of an employer’s carrier in a workmen’s compensation case is solely a creature of statute, Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith, 272 So.2d 517 (Fla.1973); Brinson v. Southeastern Utilities Service Co., 72 So.2d 37 (Fla.1954); Fidelity &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Brinson v. Southeastern Utilities Service Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Cook Motor Company v. VaughnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Alfar Creamery Company v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Dunnell v. Malone and Hyde, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shaw v. Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Batch Air Universal Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Summit Claims Mgt. v. Lawyers Exp. TruckingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005