Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 3, 2007No. 03-05-00395-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID PURYEAR, Justice.

A jury found appellee Billy Moore guilty of driving while intoxicated, for which the court imposed a 100-day term of incarceration. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West 2003). The trial court later granted Moore’s second amended motion for new trial on the ground that the State failed to disclose material evidence to the defense. On original submission, we reversed the order on procedural grounds. State v. Moore, No. 03-05-00395-CR, 2006 WL 151942, at *2, 2006 Tex.App. LEXIS 518, at *4 (Tex.App.-Austin Jan. 19, 2006) (mem. op., not designated for publication).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
  2. Asa Asuncion v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  3. Billy Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Billy Moore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  5. George Holmes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API