Legal Opinion

Equitable Trust Co. v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1944No. 69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWS, Judge.

The complaint in this case, filed on behalf of owners of more than 200 housing accommodations of various types, is an attack on Maximum Rent Regulation No. 11, issued May 27, 1942, to become effective June 1, 1942, in the Detroit Defense-Rental Area.1 It is claimed that the Regulation is invalid because it establishes April 1, 1941, as the maximum rent date and because it fails to make -adequate provision for upward adjustments of rents which on the maximum rent date were substantially lower than those generally prevailing in the Area.

In their challenge against the choice of April…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Wilson v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Philadelphia Coke Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Chatlos v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Lakemore Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutton Park Gardens v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. 315 West 97th Street Realty Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Polis v. CreedonEmergency Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Roth Hotel Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. 1165 Park Ave. Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API