Legal Opinion

Malleable Iron Fittings Co. v. Alexander F. Hall

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 2, 1948No. File 71010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolloy, J.

The claimant entered the employ of the appellant November 3, 1947, and quit his employment December 5, 1947. By § 718f (b) (2) of the 1941 Supplement, an amendment to the Unemployment Compensation Act, an employee is disqualified who “left work without sufficient cause connected with his employment.” The humanitarian purposes of the Unemployment Act are laudable and understandable. But the act can be abused, and this case is an instance of that. Situations might be pictured where transportation might be a part of “the employment.” This case is not one of those situations. In any event it is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bateman v. Howard Johnson CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Tackett v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1971
  3. Lynch v. Ad., Unemployment Comp. Act, No. Cv 91 0290207 (Nov. 13, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API