Legal Opinion

Smith v. Corn

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided May 8, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Katherine N. Smith and G-ridley B. Coburn, copartners under the firm name of K. N. Smith & Co., against Samuel Corn and Henry Corn, for breach of a building contract. Defendants had judgment on the report of a referee, and plaintiffs appeal on exceptions.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.

The plaintiffs originally sued for the second installment of $8,500, alleged to have become due on November 6, 1891, under a contract with defendants to furnish the mason, carpenter, and iron work in the erection of the six-story warehouse at No. 12 Waverly Place, in the city of New York. By their supplemental complaint (allowed by stipulation) plaintiffs claim $21,700, the value of the work and materials furnished to the said building, and also damages, upon the ground that they were prevented by defendants, on December 16, 1892, from completing their contract. The action was referred, and,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. TallmadgeNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wright v. . ReusensNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Flaherty v. . MinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Graf v. . CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Strack v. HurdNew York Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. San Francisco Bridge Co. v. Dumbarton Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API