Legal Opinion

Lisabelle v. Hubert

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 6, 1902Published

Trespass for assault and false imprisonment.

1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.

The defendant petitions for a new trial, after verdict for the plaintiff, upon the following declaration :

“Thomas Lisabelle of Pawtucket in said county, complains of Arthur Hubert, alias John Doe, of Central Falls, in said county, in the custody of the sheriff in an action of trespass for that the said defendant at said Pawtucket on the to wit, 25th day of March, A. D. 1897, with force and arms at said Pawtucket did make an assault upon the body of said plaintiff and him did unlawfully imprison and deprive of his liberty for the space of to wit, -- hours and other wrongs to said plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Morrill v. LamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Winchester v. EverettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API