Legal Opinion
Mary Domany v. Otis Elevator Company, Mary Domany v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Andrew Domany v. Otis Elevator Company, Andrew Domany v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1966No. 16638-16641_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
369 F.2d 604
Mary DOMANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Mary DOMANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Andrew DOMANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Andrew DOMANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 16638-16641.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
December 9, 1966.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Sumner Canary, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant, Otis Elevator Co. Daniel C. Schipfer, Arter, Hadden, Wykoff & Van Duzer, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.
Michael R.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Joffre v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.