Legal Opinion

Langan v. St. Vincent's Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2005PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lifson, J.

The underlying facts of this case are not in dispute. After many years of living together in an exclusive intimate relationship, Neil Conrad Spicehandler (hereinafter Conrad) and John Langan endeavored to formalize their relationship by traveling to Vermont in November 2000 and entering into a civil union. They returned to New York and continued their close, loving, committed, monogamous relationship as a family unit in a manner indistinguishable from any traditional marital relationship.

In February 2002 Conrad was hit by a car and suffered a severe fracture…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Carrick v. Central General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cruz v. McAneneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Debra H. v. Janice R.New York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Samuels v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Lewis v. New York State DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. H.M. v. E.T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API