Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Bluefield

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1948No. 10053PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riley, President:

This is an action by Maude V. Smith to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of a sidewalk being out of repair. The defendant, City of Bluefield, prosecutes error to a judgment, based on a jury verdict against it in the amount of $2,716.75.

A preliminary question was raised on special plea and demurrer to the amended declaration regarding the State Road Commission’s responsibility, if any, for the upkeep of the sidewalk. It is contended on behalf of the city that the action of the road commissioner, designating Federal Street as a part…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webb v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Yeager v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Taylor v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Roanoke v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Cannon v. SearlesCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. EdwardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Morris v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Burdick v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Burcham v. City of MullensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API