S.A.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.
S.A.S., a juvenile, appeals his adjudication for third-degree grand theft. We reverse and remand.
An essential element of third-degree grand theft is proof that the value of the stolen property is $300 or more at the time of the theft. § 812.014(2)(c)(l), Fla. Stat. (2006). At the adjudicatory hearing the victim testified regarding the purchase price of the items she had obtained many years prior to the burglary. No other evidence was given to establish the value of the items at the time of the theft. “Value means the market value of the property at the time and place of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pickett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bloodsaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Russell v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- SAS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007