Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hudspith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 28, 1993No. 0861-92-3Published

1Dissent

Barrow, I,

dissenting.

An accommodation distribution is “a sale or distribution . . . made, not by a dealer in drugs ... but by an individual citizen who was motivated by a desire to accommodate a friend, without any intent to profit or to induce or to encourage the use of drugs.” Stillwell v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 214, 219, 247 S.E.2d 360, 364 (1978); see also Heacock v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 397, 406, 323 S.E.2d 90, 95 (1984). This defendant testified that she obtained from a friend the *139ounce of marijuana she sold to the undercover officer. She did so because another friend asked her to get…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heacock v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Stillwell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API