Legal Opinion

Willett v. Seerup

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 6, 1922No. 22,515PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action in the district court for Martin county to recover $2,200 commission in selling a farm. In his answer defendant offered judgment in the sum of $225. The case was tried before Dean, J., who instructed the jury as narrated in the opinion. The jury returned a verdict for $1,200. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff sued for his commission for selling a farm for defendant and recovered a verdict for $1,200, and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff wns authorized to sell the farm for the sum of $25,600 net to defendant and was to have as his commission whatever amount he obtained above that price. He sold the farm for the sum of $27,800, being $2,200 above the net price of defendant, but in order to consummate the deal three lots in the city of Fairmont were taken as payment of $4,000 of the selling price. This fact and the fact that defendant obtained only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alden v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Siverts v. DahootSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seydel v. ReuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Hurr v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Shearer v. PuentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Dege v. Produce Exchange BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Boushor v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API