Legal Opinion

Mather v. Darst

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Grant county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Action by Frederick E. Mather against James Darst and others to foreclose a real estate mortgage. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Haney. J.

Defendant Boeder was made a party to this action, instituted for the purpose of foreclosing a real estate mortgage, as one having, or claiming to have, an interest in the mortgaged premises. He answered, setting up a tax title. The.cause was tried without a jury, judgment rendered in favor of defendant, a new trial denied, and plaintiff appealed.

Taxes for township, county, and state purposes against the land described in the mortgage having been duly assessed, equalized, and levied in 1891, and returned as delinquent, the land was sold November 7, 1892, to Charles H. Moore, who…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. DarlingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beggs v. PaineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dever v. CornwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bandow v. WolvenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gibson v. PekarekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API