Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diulus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1990No. 1000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

The Commonwealth brings this appeal from the court’s June 6, 1989 Order granting appellee’s omnibus pre-trial motion to suppress an intoxilyzer blood alcohol reading. Appellee was arrested for DUI, and he consented to the administration of an intoxilyzer test at the state police barracks; whereupon the test resulted in a reading of 0. 188%. Appellee refused a second, contemporaneous test, and he was cited for refusing and his license was automatically suspended. In a pre-trial motion, he sought to suppress the first reading because 67 Pa.Code § 77.24 mandates two consecutive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Ostrander v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Bonise v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MabreySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. ThillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. C. Flaherty v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. ThillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. PennDOT v. Fisher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API