State v. McNeil
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McCORD, Chief Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal brought by the state from an order granting appel-lee’s motion to dismiss an information charging him with burglary of a structure. The ground for dismissal was double jeopardy. We affirm.
During appellee’s trial for burglary of a structure, the prosecutor, referring to the period immediately following the arrest, asked the arresting officer,
“Did he (appellee) make any statements to you? Did you attempt to question him at all?”
The officer answered,
“We advised him of his rights and he made no statements.”
At that point, defense counsel objected…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parce v. ByrdDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Raszka v. BurkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Feria v. SpencerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Moreland v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984