Legal Opinion
State v. Faust
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 24, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] Omari Faust appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Andros-coggin County, Bradford, J.) pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of trafficking in Schedule W drugs (Class B), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1983 & Supp.1996). Faust contends that his due process and confrontation clause rights pursuant to the Maine and United States constitutions were violated by the court’s denial of the motion in limine he filed to exclude evidence after the State refused to reveal the identity of a confidential informant. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1, amend. VI; Me.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
- State v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- State v. DevlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dubois v. Dep't of Agric., Conservation & ForestrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Marcel Dubois v. Department of Agriculture, Conservation and ForestrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- State v. BoutilierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- KEY STAR PARTNERS, LLC v. INSIGNIA DISPOSAL SERVICES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023