Legal Opinion

Hopfan v. Knauth

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 13, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The city of New York, through one of its administrative agencies, i. e., the emergency relief bureau of the city of New York, distributed what is termed “ relief vouchers ” to various indigent persons to enable them to purchase food, and these food vouchers, in varying sums, were left with the family found to be in indigent circumstances. The recipient was required to go to certain designated establishments, primarily grocery stores, previously authorized by the city to accept these vouchers, and which were required to give to the recipient merchandise in the amount of each voucher. Such…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Kain v. . LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Shotwell v. . DixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Kahn v. TierneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. Bullard v. . RaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Toole v. Karnani (In Re Trinsum Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Smith, Keller & Associates v. Dorr & AssociatesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Belge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Gravel Products Division of Buffalo Crushed Stone Corp. v. Sunnydale Acres, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Knight v. Peoples National Bank of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API