Legal Opinion

Downing v. Downing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1969PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steuer J.

The instant appeal calls for the interpretation of CPLR 4102. We say this with all due humility in view of the absolute fiat in the dissent that there is simply no room for interpretation.

We start with the unequivocal statement of the Court of Appeals, which as far as we know has never been questioned: ‘ ‘ the right to a trial by jury is a personal right which must be *351timely asserted.” (Matter of Brenner v. Great Cove Realty Co., 6 N Y 2d 435, 442.) The manner of asserting the right is by including a demand for it in the note of issue and the time for so doing is when the note of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Concourse Plaza Syndicates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Tarantino v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Gonzalez v. Concourse Plaza Syndicates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Buonomo v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975
  5. Freidus v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API