Legal Opinion

In re Howard

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 1, 1873Published

1Opinion of the Court

GILES, District Judge.

The petition of F-Skinner & Co., of Boston, to review the action of the assignee in refusing to allow the claim of the petitioners as proved, and for an order allowing the same, &c. To this petition the assignee files an answer, stating that the claim of the said petitioners is not a valid claim against the said bankrupt estate, because the said notes, on which it is founded were passed by Howard, Cole & Co. to J. S. Barry & Co. under a special agreement, and were only to be used for a particular purpose, and without any consideration passing from Barry & Co. to Howard,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees of Iowa College v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  2. Fenouille v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Farrington v. Frankfort BankNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Ruddick v. LloydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  5. Jenkins v. SchaubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API