Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1923No. 17591Published

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The lower courts held the defendant coal company immune from suit, because the legal representative of the deceased had theretofore applied to the Commission for compensation, and, under the provisions of Section 1465-76, General Code, had thereby waived her option to sue for damages.

The trial court in so holding relied upon Zilch, a Minor, by etc., v. Bomgardner, 91 Ohio St., 205, 110 N. E., 459.

It is conceded by the pleadings that the application for an award was made and denied by the Commission upon the ground that Conrad, at the time of injury, was not in the employ of the defendant, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of Ky. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Water, Light & Gas Co. v. City of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Duncan v. DrakeleyOhio Supreme Court · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API