Legal Opinion

Hartley-Nagle v. State

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 27, 2005No. C.A. No. 1599-KPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

This case involves a very unusual request. The plaintiffs, Karen M. Hartley-Nagle and Michael R. Dore, have sued the Family Court of this State and all the judges of that court (“Family Court Defendants”).1 In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that on August 24, 2005 they attempted to attend a “Dependency/Neglect hearing at the Kent County Family Court”2 and “were denied access to attend the hearing by Judge William J. Walls.”3

Rather than challenging Judge Walls’s alleged decision to exclude their attendance through an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kronenberg v. KatzCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  2. Wilmington Trust Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Lecates v. LecatesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  4. Wife v. HusbandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  5. Husband, C. v. Wife, C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Com. v. Glenn, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. Com. v. Pinkney, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Starr, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Com. v. Womack, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API