Legal Opinion

Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1924No. 14790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition.(a) “A person occupies the position of a railroad passenger as respects the railroad company, who, having approached the railroad for that object, undertakes, with its express or implied consent, to travel in the car provided by it for the purpose.” Georgia Ry. & Elec. Co. v. Cole, 1 Ga. App. 33, 34; (57 S. E. 1026); Smith v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 10 Ga. App. 227 (73 S. E. 253); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Voils, 98 Ga. *731446 (26 S. E. 483, 35 L. R. A. 655); 4 Elliott on Railroads, § 1579.

Decided March 6, 1924.

2. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Western & Atlantic R. R. v. VoilsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  3. Broemsen v. AgnicWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith v. Seaboard Air-line RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Wilborn v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawthorne v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API