Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2016No. ED 103396PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

Frederick Hill, III (Defendant) appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for first-degree trespass. He asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction in that the State cannot charge him with trespassing on his own property. We affirm.

Background

The State charged Defendant with the class B misdemeanor of trespass in the first degree. At trial, the State adduced the following evidence.

In December of 2013, Mary Vinson (Vinson) and Defendant were living together in a mobile home in Bowling Green, Missouri (mobile home).…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Bateman v. RinehartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. Green v. MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
  4. State v. RichieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Investors Alliance, LLC v. BordeauxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API