Aetna Ins. Co. v. Jester
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washita County; James B. Tolbert, Judge. Action by J. A. Jester against the Aetna Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
This is an action by J. A. Jester against the Aetna Insurance Company, brought on a fire insurance policy to recover for the loss of certain property by fire. The policy sued on contained the usual appraisal clause, which provided, in substance, that, if disagreement arose between the insured and the company with reference to the loss, it should be determined by appraisers, after appraisement, ascertainment, estimate, and satisfactory proof' of loss had been received by the company, in accordance with the terms of the policy. It also .provided that the insured and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Levine v. Lancashire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Hall v. Norwalk Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Canfield v. Watertown Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Vincent v. Germah InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Appointment of Umpire for Hayes Family Trust v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Massey v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc., Limited v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Ætna Ins. v. HefferlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.