Bailey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Judge.
The offense is the possession of intoxicating liquor, and the punishment is three years in the penitentiary.
Appellant complains at the court’s action in overruling his first application for a continuance. The application is not in conformity with the statute, and the court’s ruling thereon was correct. Art. 543, 1925 Revised C. C. P.
The court did not err in overruling the motion to quash the indictment. The indictment follows the language of the statute and this statute has often been held by this court to be valid.
We cannot agree with appellant’s contention that the jury should…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Baldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- West v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Gates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.