Legal Opinion
State v. Cottew
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 20, 2007No. A06-785PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s imposition of jail time and home confinement with electronic monitoring as intermediate sanctions for her probation violations, arguing that the district court failed to make the findings required by State v. Austin, 295 N.W.2d 246, 250 (Minn.1980), reaffirmed in State v. Modtland, 695 N.W.2d 602, 606 (Minn.2005). We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Appellant Toyie Cottew was convicted of fourth-degree driving while impaired, a violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 169A.20, subd. 1(1), .27 (2002). The district court sentenced Cottew to 90 days in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. B.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. CottewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008