Vance's administrator v. Foster & Ray
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 39 — JUDICIAL SALE APPEAL PROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Code of Practice, section 426. Story on Sales, section 300. ■ Littell’s Select Cases, 217. 7 Dana, 60. 4 Bibb, 66. 14 B. Mon. 413. 6 Dana, 49. 2 B. Mon. 411. 3 Met. 544. 2 Duvall, 332. CITED 3 Dana, 622. 2 B. Mon. 411. 3 Met. 544, Taylor v. Gilpin. 5 B. Mon. 494, Dale v. Shirley. 12 Beavan, 260, Robertson v. Skelton. 1 Sm. & G. 241, Paramar v. Grenstade.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hardin
The Marion Circuit Court having in the suit of J. J. Vance’s administrator against said Vance’s heirs and creditors adjudged a sale of certain real and personal estate to satisfy the decedent’s debts, the commissioner appointed to make the sales proceeded to do so, in conformity to the judgment, on the 4th day of March, 1872, and thereupon sold in several distinct parcels, as personal property, the machinery of a planing-mill, most of which was purchased by the appellees, Foster & Ray, who agreed to but did not execute bond for the aggregate amount of their purchases, nor did they take actual…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Worrell Manufacturing Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Cropper v. BrownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- German Bank v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Moller v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Bond v. Brand's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.