Legal Opinion

Barry v. Grela

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

The plaintiff claims a right to walk on the defendants’ land, between high and low water marks, in order to fish from a jetty not owned by the defendants. A judge of the Superior Court decided that the plaintiff has the right he claims, and the defendants appealed. We uphold the right as part of the “free fishing and fowling” granted by the colonial ordinance of 1641-1647, found in the 1649 codification, The Book of the General Lawes and Libertyes, at 50. See Opinion of the Justices, 365 Mass. 681, 685 (1974). With a minor change for clarification, we affirm the judgment.

We summarize the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Butler v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Packard v. RyderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Connerty v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Pazolt v. Director of the Division of Marine FisheriesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Connerty v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Mulvey v. Board of Selectmen of the Town of BourneMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API