Green Hill Corporation v. Charles C. Kim Duak F. Kim Bank of Seoul/new York Agency
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentK.K. Hall, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority's conclusion that Green Hill did not satisfy Virginia *745state law requirements for the creation of a lien solely by the filing of a memorandum lis pendens. I cannot, however, agree with the majority’s view that this Court is powerless to grant Green Hill’s request for relief from the automatic stay.
While the automatic stay provision of § 362(a)(4) prohibits “any act to create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the estate ...,” § 362(b)(3) makes it clear that the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not operate as a stay “of any act to perfect an interest…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maryland National Bank v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, in the Matter of Maryland Glass Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Yobe Electric, Inc., Debtor. Yobe Electric, Inc. v. Graybar Electric Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Hart v. United Virginia Bank (In Re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
- In Re RidleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Matter of Marietta Baptist Tabernacle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978