Legal Opinion
Boellert v. Lumpkin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 2, 1993No. 92-1203PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. CULPEPPER, Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is the correctness of the trial court’s sustaining Patricia Lumpkin’s exception of no cause of action during the trial on the merits. We affirm.
FACTS
This appeal arises from a suit on an open account. Plaintiff, Karl Boellert, filed this suit for payment of $30,948 of attorney fees allegedly owed to him by Brent and Patricia Lumpkin. Boellert alleges he had rendered legal services to defendants in connection with business dealings from March 1987 through August 1990. He made periodic demands for payment during the performance of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shafer v. State, Through DOTDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- Miller v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Moore v. Shell Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CorbelloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- D'Arbonne Bank & Trust Co. v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Natchitoches Parish Law Enforcement District v. Decimal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Natchitoches Parish Law Enforcement District v. Decimal, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013