Legal Opinion

Leo L. Lowy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 4, 1961No. 26545_1PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, Circuit Judge.

This case arises upon a petition to review a deficiency in the petitioner’s income taxes for the year 1944. In his return for that year the petitioner showed a loss of nearly $200,000, which the Commissioner on audit changed to a tax due of over $600,000 which together with a 50% fraud penalty and interest is claimed to create a total tax liability of $1,600,-000. The Commissioner’s figures are not disputed, but the assessment was barred by the Statute of Limitations on May 15, 1948 — three years after the date when the return for 1944 was filed. The Commissioner argues…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helvering v. KehoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. National City Bank of New York v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Heyman v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Thomas Worcester v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  3. Sadler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  4. Colestock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  5. Considine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API