Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Smyth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 21, 1998No. 1-97-0467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE LEAVITT

delivered the opinion of the court:

On July 16, 1996, Shandoulia Wallace filed her second amended complaint alleging the defendants acted negligently, willfully, and wantonly with regard to Waketta Wallace (Waketta). The judge subsequently granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the negligence claims. She held Illinois’ parental immunity doctrine shielded the defendants from liability for negligence because they stood in loco parentis to Waketta. We reverse and remand.

Twelve-year-old Waketta, a ward of Illinois, was, on July 11, 1989, temporarily residing at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fitzgerald v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lawson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Bland v. Department of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Lawber v. DoilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. SmythIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Nichol v. StassIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Nichol v. StassIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Nichol v. Stass Text corrected - Oct. 2, 2000Illinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wallace v. SmythIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API