Legal Opinion

Leo M. Eisel v. Secretary of the Army. Gary S. Gelber v. Secretary of the Air Force

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 28, 1973No. 71-1943, 71-1944PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKEY, Circuit Judge:

Appellants in this case are two members of the “inactive reserve” of the United States Army and Air Force who voluntarily joined the Armed Forces, but who were permitted to complete their educations before beginning tours of active duty. Prior to entering active duty appellants allegedly became conscientious objectors and under the appropriate military regulations sought release from their military obligations. The Army and Air Force denied appellants’ requests for discharge, whereupon appellants petitioned the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia for a writ…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Ex Parte EndoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. William Rodger Starnes v. Honorable Matthew F. McGuire Arthur Everett Small, Jr. v. Honorable George L. Hart, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Willie Griffin, Jr. v. EbbertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Padilla v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Rooney v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API