Legal Opinion
Direct Travel, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered on or about May 27, 1994, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it, and declared that Aetna had no duty to defend or indemnify plaintiff with respect to claims asserted against it in Stuckey v Direct Travel, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that defendant was relieved of its duty to defend and indemnify plaintiff in the underlying…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Moshiko, Inc. v. Seiger & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Smith Pontiac-GMC Truck Center, Inc. v. Hartford Accident Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Utica, NY v. Genesee Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Thruway Produce, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- Shared-Interest Management, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. & Hugo Boss Usa, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.