Legal Opinion

Advanced Nano Coatings, Inc. v. Joseph Hana

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2012No. 10-20865UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

This appeal is from a summary judgment, and it stems from an employment contract. The three Plaintiffs-Appellants, Vado AG (Vado), the employer corporation, Advanced Nano Corporation (ANC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Vado, and Intumescents Associates Group (IAG), an affiliated partnership, allege that the Defendant-Appellee employee breached his fiduciary duties and tortiously interfered with a prospective contract. The employer also alleged that the employee breached the employment contract. The district court held that the employer lacked standing to bring suit. Further, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hoggett v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Alcan Aluminium Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. v. Oceanografia, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ultraflo Corp. v. Pelican Tank Parts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API