Legal Opinion

Fields v. SHERIFF, CLARK CTY.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1977No. 10319PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

At the conclusion of a preliminary examination, Frank Bailey Fields was ordered to stand trial for two counts of sexual assault, felonies under NRS 200.364 and NRS 200.366. A pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus contended: (1) the sexual assault statute is unconstitutional; and, (2) the six-year-old victim was incompetent to testify at the preliminary examination. The district court denied habeas, and, in this appeal, Fields reasserts the same contentions.

1. In support of his first contention Fields claims that the definition of “sexual penetration” contained in the sexual…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Woofter v. O'DONNELLNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Shuff v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Mirin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1977

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilmeth v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Carlisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Maes v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Wilmeth v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API