Legal Opinion

Ricketts v. Geil

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1940No. 30747PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

• This is an action to recover judgment for the amount due on a promissory note. The defense plead was lack of consideration. Trial was to a jury. After both parties had rested, the trial court sustained a motion by the plaintiff for an instructed verdict. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

*532There is no serious dispute about the facts. The Lincoln Trust Company and the Lincoln Safe Deposit Company were separate corporations. The Deposit Company was owned entirely by the Trust Company. The two companies had the same officers and personnel, occupied the same quarters,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mohr v. RickgauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CurryNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stebbings v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson & Vogt v. LivingstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API