Legal Opinion
State v. Spry
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 8, 2001No. 20000244-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
T1 Sandra Spry, aka Sandra Chlopitsky (Defendant), having obtained our leave to take an interlocutory appeal, appeals the trial court's order denying her motion to compel discovery and granting the State's motion for discovery. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 On August 5, 1999, at approximately 1:30 a.m., a police officer observed Defendant behaving suspiciously near an automated teller machine. The officer drove up to Defendant to investigate. Defendant approached the officer and began speaking to him. The officer could smell alcohol on Defendant's breath. - Defendant 'denied…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Perdomo, Juan John Doe A/K/A "Juan," Juan PerdomoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert Neil Conder, United States of America v. Bernard Joseph Grogan, United States of America v. William Moore PegramCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Ostler v. BuhlerUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Engstrom v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SteffenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- American Interstate Mortgage Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- State v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- State v. McNearneyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.