Legal Opinion

McCord v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1912No. 3278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trover; from city court of Washington — Judge Wynne. cited: 4 Ga. .App. 733 (4), 739; 111 Ga. 668-72; 117 Ga. 161; 118 Ga. 543. cited: 7 Ga. App. 354, 519; 67 Ga. 672.

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, C. J. 1. The petition in. a bail-trover suit described specifically each article of property sought to be recovered, but failed to give the value of each article, giving the aggregate value of all the articles described. Meld, that the value of the articles was sufficiently stated, and a demurrer to the petition because the value of each separate article was not given was properly overruled.

2. The property sought to be recovered in a bail-trover suit was transferred to the plaintiff by the defendant as security for the payment of a promissory note, under § 3306 of the Civil Code (1910).…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ayash v. Georgia Show-Case Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Seaboard Security Co. v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Williams v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API