Legal Opinion

State v. L. & A. Contracting Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1961No. 41956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This case involves the validity of a state income tax deduction as an ordinary and necessary business expense or loss incurred in trade or business. A successor corporation, owned by the partners, assumed and paid a debt of the predecessor partnership, under a claimed necessity to obtain future financing from the creditor. We hold the payment is not a deductible expense or loss.

L. & A. Contracting Company (called L. & A.) is a corporation domiciled at Hattiesburg, Mississippi, and engaged in the business of contracting for highway construction. It filed its Mississippi income tax return for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. White v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Tupelo Garment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad v. StrackbeinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Purcell Co. v. MISSISSIPPI STATE TAXMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona State Department of RevenueArizona Tax Court · 1991
  4. BBM Ventures, LLC, Ballery Bully and Greta Bully v. Herb Frierson, in his Official Capacity as the Commissioner of Revenue of the Mississippi Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022
  5. Back Bay Lawnscapes LLC, Lowell Fountain and Bethany Fountain v. Christopher Graham, In His Official Capacity as The Commissioner of the Mississippi Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API