Caramanica v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Special Term erred in holding that appellant’s moving papers were insufficient to grant its cross motion for summary judgment. While an affirmation by an attorney who does not have personal knowledge of the essential facts is insufficient (David Graubart, Inc. v Bank Leumi Trust Co., 48 NY2d 554), in this case the cross motion was based on the affirmation of an attorney with personal knowledge of the facts. The cross motion was based on the contentions that appellant’s attorneys had asked plaintiff to submit to an examination under oath pursuant to the parties’ standard fire insurance…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lentini Bros. Moving & Storage Co. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bulzomi v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- David Graubart, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard B. Rosenthal v. Prudential Property & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GiganteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Arias v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2003
- Werdein v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Diamond Den, Ltd. v. Jefferson InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.