Legal Opinion

Nunziato v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Action for breach of contract under which the plaintiff furnished to the defendant, The City of White Plains, certain foods delivered to recipients of relief during a specified period. Order denying defendant’s motion, under Civil Practice Rule 107, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had obtained an audit of his claim, which audit was res judicata of the claim sued upon, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Where a city is involved, a contractor’s remedy for non-payment on a municipal contract is by mandamus order where the non-payment arises as a consequence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Weston v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Port Jervis Water Works Co. v. Village of Port JervisNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Reynolds v. President of the Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  5. People ex rel. Foster v. JusticeNew York Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Utilities & Industries Corp. v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API