Legal Opinion

Lingner v. Haley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1954No. 6416PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from- an order appointing a receiver ex parte and without notice or a hearing held, entered upon the application of appellees, Ed Haley, d/b/a Lubbock Wholesale Florist,..Tom Maben and Floyd Maben, partners,. d/b./a Maben Wholesale Floral & Supply Company, and O. A. Roberts, d/b/a Western Greenhouse. In a .verified, petition appellees alleged themselves to be unsecured creditors in the total sum of $7376.39 of defendant Gatha L. Lingner, a feme sole, who had been engaged in a retail floral business in Lubbock, Texas, operating under the name of Texas…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Goodner Wholesale Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Zanes v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Southwestern Drug Corp. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Haywood v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Security Land Co. v. South Texas Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Trimming Products, Inc. v. S. C. Nelson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1984
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1984
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API