Robertson v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WATKINS, District Judge.
This cause was submitted to me by stipulation of counsel upon an agreed statement of facts, each party reserving the right of objection to any portion of the facts stated because of irrelevancy. Tlie action was begun by the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of Public Indemnity Company, in the court of common pleas for Anderson county, S. G, and thereafter removed to this court upon petition of the defendant the Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York. No answer or other pleading was ever filed by, or on behalf of, any of the other defendants. The action was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frink v. National Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp. v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Montgomery v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Equitable Surety Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Nofal v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robertson v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936