Legal Opinion

State v. Woodson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1995No. 83PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

We are called upon in this case to determine whether double jeopardy bars retrial of a greater offense after a mistrial has been declared on both the greater offense, on which the jury was hung, and a lesser included offense, on which the jury reached a verdict but did not announce that verdict. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that double jeopardy does not prohibit retrial of the greater offense even though it may bar retrial of the lesser included offense.

I

Thomas Andrew Woodson (Woodson) was charged in a four-count indictment with distribution of a controlled…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Odum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API