Legal Opinion
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Gori
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 4, 1927PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Schulz, S.
The petitioner, a son of the decedent, applies for an order vacating a decree of probate and revoking letters testamentary issued thereupon.
It appears that when the will was offered for probate, the petitioner appeared by an attorney, filed objections and demanded a jury trial. An order was made settling the controverted questions *542of fact to be submitted to a jury, and thereafter and on June 7, 1926, the proceeding was upon the calendar for hearing. It was adjourned to June 21, 1926, at which time the objections were withdrawn, and thereafter proofs were taken and a decree made…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of HermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In Re Proving the Will of HermannNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In re the Estate of LeslieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of De BelardinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
- In re the Estates of SchinasiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Probate of the Will of WhiteNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In Matter of Estate of JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of HugNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.