Roebuck v. Steuart
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
POLLITT, Judge.
This convoluted conglomeration of claims compels a certain circumlocution in its consideration. Our chore is complicated by counsel’s non-compliance with Rules 8-501(h) and (i) (formerly Rule 1028 a) concerning the Table of Contents and Format of the Record Extract. 1
Appellant and cross appellee, Janice L. Roebuck, and others, were sued in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County as guarantors of the debts of Express Liquors, Inc., a bankrupt corporation, by six liquor suppliers of that corporation. Alleging that any liability on her part to those creditors was caused by…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- H & R BLOCK, INC. v. TestermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- General Motors Corp. v. LahockiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Schaefer v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Stanley v. TrinchardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.