Legal Opinion
Romulus v. Katz
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 5, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Samuel Greenstein, J.
Defendant moves herein to strike the plaintiff’s jury demand. The facts are as follows:
Plaintiff initially filed a notice of trial without demanding a jury in January, 1980. The case was stricken from the calendar; plaintiff filed a second notice of trial to restore it, again without demanding a jury, in February, 1981. The case was again stricken from the calendar; plaintiff’s subsequent motion to restore was granted in November, 1982, upon condition that plaintiff serve and file a new notice of trial.
It is this third notice of trial which is in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Calspan Corp. v. Fingermatrix, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Fleischer v. Institute for Research in HypnosisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
3Cited by2 opinions
- Import Alley of Mid-Island, Inc. v. Mid-Island Shopping Plaza, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Commack Enterprises v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1989